Tag Archives: conflict

Reduce Conflicts… Increase your EQ

From: https://www.flickr.com/photos/hikingartist/ CC License - Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0)

From: https://www.flickr.com/photos/hikingartist/
CC License – Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-ND 2.0)

Due to a fortuitous convergence of related articles I have been thinking a lot about Emotional Intelligence, whether we can change it for ourselves and how one’s EQ relates to interpersonal conflicts.

Unless you live in a bubble you’re likely exposed to POTENTIAL interpersonal conflicts on a weekly (if not daily) basis. I say POTENTIAL because we have a fair bit of control over whether these actually develop into conflicts. Having two teenage children, right now, I have been reflecting A LOT on how to reduce interpersonal conflict (that should give you a clue as to how often these potential conflicts develop!). Occasionally, conflicts at work also occur… So, I read a useful article on “Five Secrets for Mastering Conflict” published by the “VitalSmarts” folks who are behind Crucial Conversations and CrucialSkills. Skills for Change. Change for Good.

Essentially, before having a crucial/difficult conversation…

  • Be truthful without being brutally honest. I like to call it compassionate honesty.
  • Get your facts straight first and link them to your feelings… don’t just share your feelings without facts, it turns people off and causes them to tune you out, fast.
  • Don’t listen defensively, listen with true intent to understand the other’s perspective.
  • Take honest responsibility for how YOU have contributed to the situation.
  • Instead of being afraid of saying something because you fear the costs, if things don’t go well, consider the costs if you don’t say what needs to be said and try to think positive about how the conversation could turn out if it goes well.

The possible problem with all this is that these skills directly relate to one’s Emotional Intelligence. So… if your EQ isn’t great, what do you do? Can an EQ be increased? The good news is, it can! It’s not easy but there are some basic, positives to get us going down the path to improvement. According to Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic in the Harvard Business Review, there are 5 key points to consider:

  1. We CAN change our EQ but long term improvements require plenty of hard work and guidance/feedback. Luckily, our EQ tends to naturally improve with age.
  2. Interpersonal Skills is the most coachable characteristic of one’s EQ.
  3. To improve, we need specific and accurate feedback – like, 360-degree feedback and other specific, accurate coaching processes.
  4. Since some techniques and processes are better than others, focus on the ones that are in the “cognitive-behavioral therapy” realm NOT the “self-esteem/confidence-building” realm.
  5. Some people are simply more coachable than others… this is not a reason to give up! This is a reason to do a coachability pre-assessment to help initially map the journey and increase the effectiveness of the coaching.

    From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_Intelligence_2.0 This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

    From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_Intelligence_2.0
    This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

The bottom line is, if you really want to improve, there are concrete ways to do it that can help you develop better interpersonal communication skills that can help reduce conflict. Here is another resource on improving one’s EQ:

Dichotomy! Human nature? Conflict or complement?

00-dichotomy_sm2According to Wikipedia, dichotomy can be defined as:

“A dichotomy is any splitting of a whole into exactly two non-overlapping parts.  In other words, it is a partition of a whole (or a set) into two parts (subsets) that are:

The two parts thus formed are complements.”

Can someone… anyone… please help me understand what seems to me to be the human penchant for making conflict where none needs to be?  I think nature is full of dichotomous examples that, instead of leading to conflict are complimentary.  In fact, my understanding of the definition of dichotomy leads me to believe that differences are complementary and shouldn’t be the cause of conflict.

Yet… Apple vs. Microsoft (same domain – computers); Shi’a vs. Sunni (Muslims); Catholics vs. Protestants (Christians)… conflict abounds. Are these true dichotomies?  Not really.  There’s almost always: a third option and/or middle ground as well as something shared by both sides.  So, again… why choose to see these relationships as in conflict?  Why not look at them as complementary systems?

For example, Apple and Microsoft.  Does one HAVE to be better than the other?  Why not admit the strengths of each one and use each system for what they’re good for?  (of course, I say this because our school is in the process of switching from Windows PCs to Macs and I like both!)

Let’s try to find something within the people that we deal with on a daily basis that can complement our own strengths.  Go for the win-win.  Why make (or further involve ourselves in) conflict when we can shift our perspective and learn something new or be a stronger team by complementing each other (double-entendre intended).

COMPLEMENT or CONFLICT?  The choice is yours.